Baseball Toaster Catfish Stew
Log in | Register | Help
STOP CASTING POROSITY! An Oakland Athletics blog.
Hot from the Toaster
Search
Google Search
Web
Toaster
Catfish Stew
Archives

2008
11  10  09  08  07 
06  05  04  03  02  01 

2007
12  11  10  09  08  07 
06  05  04  03  02  01 

2006
12  11  10  09  08  07 
06  05  04  03  02  01 

2005
12  11  10  09  08  07 
06  05  04  03  01 

2004
12  09  08  01 

2003
12  11  10  09  08 
A's Web Sites
MLB Heavyweight Champion

If MLB champs were decided like boxing: beat the champ, and you're the champ.

The 2008 season started with the Red Sox as champs. They were beaten by the A's, who were beaten back by Boston, who were then swept by Toronto, who lost to Oakland, who lost to Cleveland, and so on, until we reached our current champion.

The Heavyweight of the Year is the team that wins the most title bouts at the end of the season.

2008 Heavyweight of the Year:
New York Mets

Final Regular Season Champion:
Atlanta Braves

2008 Title Bout Records:

Mets2619
Cubs164
Phillies1514
Athletics1313
Red Sox117
Padres109
Braves97
Nationals915
Rockies714
Brewers61
Angels64
Indians611
Cardinals55
Reds55
Marlins55
Dodgers57
Rangers46
Blue Jays33
Mariners21
Yankees23
Tigers12
Giants03
Orioles03
Pirates03

2007 Heavyweight of the Year:
Seattle Mariners

2006 Heavyweight of the Year:
Oakland Athletics

2005 Heavyweight of the Year:
Oakland Athletics

more info...

Email Us

Ken: catfish AT zombia d.o.t. com
Ryan: rarmbrust AT gmail d.o.t. com
Philip: kingchimp AT alamedanet d.o.t net

Minor Leagues
Syndication

rss2.0

Add to My Yahoo!
Game 3 Visual Pitching Summary
2007-04-05 12:26
by Ryan Armbrust

(For those not familiar with this kind of chart, it's a product of these two posts in the offseason.)

-- - --

On a night when Rich Harden needed but a single run to secure a victory for the green and gold, the A's poured out nine of them. Dan Haren and Joe Blanton could have used some of those in the first two games of the series, but no one has yet found a way to put runs into a savings account for days like that.

Harden wasn't as dominant as he was in spring training, but we can't expect him to strike out almost 15 per nine innings in the regular season. His current 9.0 SO/9 is perfectly fine by me.

His first three innings were fantastic, but Harden ran into some trouble in the fourth. Ichiro singled, and then Adrian Beltre worked an eight pitch at-bat before grounding into a double play. For some reason, Harden then issued a four-pitch walk to Jose Vidro, the first of two four-pitch walks on the game for Harden.

From the fourth inning on, Harden threw 23 balls. He threw only seven in the first three innings. Over the course of the game, he threw first-pitch balls to nine of the 25 batters he faced.

I don't mean to be overly critical of Harden's outing, though. When you have to break it down that far to find anything, there's not much to worry about.

Comments
2007-04-05 14:04:02
1.   Ken Arneson
I think Harden probably got a little bored at the end with the big lead, and lost a little concentration. But as soon as he got into a little trouble, he righted himself.

Did you see the Mariners' first hit? It was a perfectly thrown 0-2 splitter, about a inch off the ground and three inches off the plate. Ichiro golfed it over the shortstop's head for a single. How do you pitch to a guy who can do that?

2007-04-05 15:29:50
2.   Ryan Armbrust
I did see Ichiro's hit. It's a given that Ichiro is going to get his hits, you just have to make sure no one is in scoring position when he's up. I'm not sure how he does it, but I'm guessing that it's some sort of ancient samurai magic.
2007-04-08 05:13:33
3.   studes
Love the graphical thingie. But, FWIW, I can't read it very well. I'm partially color-blind (as are approximately 10% of all men, I think) and I can't differentiate the colors well. I particularly can't see the "ball" dots on top of the gray background.

If it were me, I would simplify the colors and get rid of the gray background. Also, I'd throw in vertical lines for every change of batter instead of every out. And I'd get rid of the "strikeout" line, because you lose information using that (I'd rather know if it was a called or swinging strike, and the vertical line tells me that it was a strikeout).

I guess the progression on the Y axis from best to worst outcome is okay, but not really relevant to me, as a reader. I'd get more out of seeing balls not in play above the line, and balls in play below the line (or vice versa).

Hope you don't mind -- just some thoughts.

Post a comment   (Help)

To comment, please log in.

Not a member? Register!