Baseball Toaster Catfish Stew
Help
STOP CASTING POROSITY! An Oakland Athletics blog.
Frozen Toast
Search
Google Search
Web
Toaster
Catfish Stew
Archives

2009
02  01 

2008
12  11  10  09  08  07 
06  05  04  03  02  01 

2007
12  11  10  09  08  07 
06  05  04  03  02  01 

2006
12  11  10  09  08  07 
06  05  04  03  02  01 

2005
12  11  10  09  08  07 
06  05  04  03  01 

2004
12  09  08  01 

2003
12  11  10  09  08 
Email Us

Ken: catfish AT zombia d.o.t. com
Ryan: rarmbrust AT gmail d.o.t. com
Philip: kingchimp AT alamedanet d.o.t net

Ken's Greatest Hits
28 Aug 2003
12 Jan 2004
31 May 2005
11 May 2005
29 Jun 2005
8 Jun 2005
19 Jul 2005
11 Aug 2005
7 Sep 2005
20 Sep 2005
22 Sep 2005
26 Sep 2005
28 Sep 2005
29 Sep 2005
18 Oct 2005
9 Nov 2005
15 Nov 2005
20 Nov 2005

13 Dec 2005
19 Jan 2006
28 Jan 2006
21 Feb 2006
10 Apr 2006
16 Apr 2006
22 Apr 2006
7 May 2006
25 May 2006
31 May 2006
18 Jun 2006
22 Jun 2006
6 Jul 2006
17 Jul 2006
13 Aug 2006
15 Aug 2006
16 Aug 2006
20 Aug 2006
11 Oct 2006
31 Oct 2006
29 Dec 2006
4 Jan 2006
12 Jan 2006
27 Jan 2007
17 Feb 2007
30 Apr 2007
27 Aug 2007
5 Sep 2007
19 Oct 2007
23 Nov 2007
5 Jan 2008
16 Jan 2008
4 Feb 2008
7 May 2008
20 Jun 2008
4 Feb 2008
Playoff Predictions 2007
2007-10-02 20:41
by Ken Arneson

In my preseason predictions over on the Juice Blog this year, I picked the Cubs to win the World Series. Last year, my preseason prediction was right, as I picked the Cardinals to win it all. The year before, I didn't make a preseason World Series prediction, but my postseason playoff prediction formula correctly predicted the White Sox as champions. This formula, which relies solely on the number of errors each team committed during the season (and accurately picks the Division Series winner 67% of the time), fell apart last year with a number of ties in error totals. This year, there are no ties: it predicts the Cubs to lose the Series to the Yankees.

The formula says:

(LDS: pick the team with the fewest errors)
Rockies (68 errors) over Phillies (89).
Cubs (94) over Diamondbacks (106).
Yankees (88) over Indians (92).
Red Sox (81) over Angels (101).

(LCS: reverse it, and pick the team with the most errors)
Cubs over Rockies.
Yankees over Red Sox.

(World Series: pick the team with the fewest errors)
Yankees over Cubs.

OK, so which one do I choose as my final answer--my formula or my preseason choice? Picking the Yankees is boring. I'll go with my preseason one--the errors formula works better in the LDS than in later rounds, anyway. Plus, I'd rather have fun than be right, any day. Go Cubs!

Feel free to leave your own playoff predictions in the comments.

* * *

Congratulations to the Seattle Mariners for winning the highly coveted title of Heavyweight of the Year. They swept the Texas Rangers in the final weekend of the year to take the crown.

* * *

I should probably add the disclaimer that while I've had some success in making predictions in general, I totally suck at predicting the AL West.  Whenever I pick the A's, the Angels win the division, and vice versa.  Clearly, I know nothing at all about that particular division.

Comments
2007-10-02 21:12:41
1.   Daniel Zappala
Drats, if the Angels had swept Texas too, then they would have had home field advantage. Stupid Rangers.

I have no formula, but my predictions are the same as yours, except for Rockies over Cubs and Yankees over Rockies. I posted these on Dodger Thoughts earlier today and didn't copy yours.

My rooting interests would have the Angels beat the Rockies, but I don't have much confidence the Angels can beat the Red Sox. If they did, it would be akin to the Angels beating the Yankees in 2002, and we know how that turned out and how well the Angels have played them ever since.

2007-10-02 22:54:15
2.   Bob Timmermann
Boston over LA, NY over Cleveland, Boston over NY

AZ over Chicago, Colorado over Philadelphia, AZ over Colorado

Boston over AZ.

2007-10-03 00:38:58
3.   xaphor
Boston over California
Cleveland over NY
Arizona over Chicago
Phily over Colorado

Boston over Cleveland
Arizona over Phily

Boston over Arizona

Out of the blue and into the white. A non-curse breaking win for the Sox should be less insufferable than one for Byrnesie.

2007-10-03 07:04:25
4.   dianagramr
Sox over Angels
Yankees over Indians (torn on this one)
Cubs over DBacks
Rockies over Philly

Sox over Yankees
Cubs over Rockies

Sox over Cubs

(before the season, I picked Tigers over Brewers, so what do I know?)

2007-10-03 08:12:21
5.   D4P
First of all, there is a significant positive correlation between Errors and Runs Allowed.

I suspect that choosing teams based Errors "works" as well as it does because you are (by proxy) simultaneously (to some extent) choosing them based on Runs Allowed.

Every one of Ken's picks also chooses the team that gave up the fewest runs except for every game involving the Yankees.

2007-10-03 10:08:54
6.   Ken Arneson
6 Yes, but I checked all the major stats, and errors predicted the division series better than any of the others, including runs allowed. The only other stat that was close to errors was fielding percentage. Most of the other stats had the better team winning about 58-62% of the time; fielding percentage was about 66%, and errors 67%.

I have no idea why. Perhaps it's just a fluke, especially considering that this did not show up in the LCS or World Series, but I'm sticking with it.

2007-10-03 10:09:49
7.   Ken Arneson
6 I always do that. I meant 5 .
2007-10-03 10:28:07
8.   D4P
6
Interesting. The other thing Errors (negatively) correlates with is Quality Starts. Did you check that...?
2007-10-03 10:47:28
9.   Ken Arneson
No, QS was not one of the stats I checked.
2007-10-03 10:52:54
10.   D4P
9
Would it be hard to check...?
2007-10-03 14:15:05
11.   Ken Arneson
Not hard, but I don't have time for that right now.
2007-10-03 15:51:32
12.   be2ween
Rox over Phillies
Cubs over Snakes
Injuns over Evil Empire
Red Sox over Halo(e)s

Rockies over Cubs
Injuns over Sox

Injuns over Rockies

Should be fun!
Thanks Stewie!

Comment status: comments have been closed. Baseball Toaster is now out of business.