
The 2008 season started with the Red Sox as champs. They were beaten by the A's, who were beaten back by Boston, who were then swept by Toronto, who lost to Oakland, who lost to Cleveland, and so on, until we reached our current champion.
The Heavyweight of the Year is the team that wins the most title bouts at the end of the season.
2008 Title Bout Records:
| Mets | 23 | 17 |
| Athletics | 13 | 13 |
| Red Sox | 11 | 7 |
| Cubs | 9 | 1 |
| Padres | 8 | 6 |
| Rockies | 7 | 14 |
| Angels | 6 | 4 |
| Indians | 6 | 11 |
| Brewers | 5 | 0 |
| Cardinals | 5 | 5 |
| Reds | 5 | 5 |
| Dodgers | 5 | 7 |
| Marlins | 4 | 3 |
| Rangers | 4 | 6 |
| Blue Jays | 3 | 3 |
| Nationals | 3 | 5 |
| Mariners | 2 | 1 |
| Yankees | 2 | 3 |
| Phillies | 2 | 5 |
| Tigers | 1 | 2 |
| Giants | 0 | 3 |
| Orioles | 0 | 3 |
2006 Heavyweight of the Year:
Oakland Athletics
2005 Heavyweight of the Year:
Oakland Athletics
Ken: catfish AT zombia d.o.t. com
Ryan: rarmbrust AT gmail d.o.t. com
Philip: kingchimp AT alamedanet d.o.t net
2008 Stats
Baseball Toaster runs on some experimental software called Fairpole. It's still under development.
For more information, please visit the Fairpole blog, or read the FAQ.

Continuing the popup theme...it's a pretty neat trick to get everyone in this picture except Nick Swisher and the umpire completely out of focus. I wish I knew how I did that.
Also, any tips for taking good baseball photos. If you want to drop some mad F/stop knowledge on us, it would be appreciated.
I have a lot more trouble during night games. If I leave the shutter open long enough to let light in, the moving players get blurry, and if I do a quick shutter, the picture is often too dark. This picture above is part of my night-game struggles; I still haven't figured out the optimal settings yet. Right now, I lean towards taking the picture too dark, and letting Photoshop brighten it up afterwards. But then, the picture looks somewhat grainy.
Had you been using a fully manual camera, you'd be doing three things to get the image right:
Focus: you'd focus on Swisher. The umpire appears to be at around the same focal depth, so you accidentally get the ump in focus too.
Shutter speed: you'd push this as fast as possible to reduce the blur on fast-moving objects. So the ump is not so blurry because a fast shutter speed was probably used.
Aperture: you'd open the aperture wide to allow more light in (compensating for the low light conditions and the faster shutter speed). The consequence of a wide aperture is that the focal depth shortens, so only those things in a similar depth as the main focus point will be in focus, and everything else blurs. Under similar lighting conditions but a completely still setting, you could get more things in focus by having a slower shutter speed but a narrower aperture.
If you wanted to get more things in focus in these circumstances, however, you'd need more light or a faster film speed -- did I say film? He he.
1) Turn your camera to its manual, aperture-fixed mode, and open your lens as wide as it will go.
2) Turn the ISO-equivalent on your camera to as high a number as it will support (this will by 1600 for this camera).
3) Remember your camera will need a ton more stability at night than in the daytime. If you can swing it, use a monopod. (They won't let you take one into some of the stadiums I've been to lately.)
Not that it's perfect, but it does turn out some decent shots:
http://www.doubledogmusic.com/baseball/2006-09-18_Padres@Dodgers/50.html
http://www.doubledogmusic.com/baseball/2006-09-18_Padres@Dodgers/51.html
I think much of my problem is that there are so many buttons and switches and dials on the camera, I have a hard time figuring out how to do things like turn off the flash, or change the ISO setting, or adjust the aperture. I need my manual to figure those things out, and I usually don't take it with me to the ballgame, so I just end up going, "maybe next time" and then I get home and forget.
To comment, please log in.
Not a member? Register!