Baseball Toaster was unplugged on February 4, 2009.
Ken: catfish AT zombia d.o.t. com
Ryan: rarmbrust AT gmail d.o.t. com
Philip: kingchimp AT alamedanet d.o.t net
Billy Beane was quoted in the Los Angeles Times this morning (via Jon) as follows:
On a recent morning, Beane took note of a website that attempted to calculate how many runs the A's could score with every possible lineup combination."With the Internet and blogs, you have so much more," Beane said. "You've almost got a 'wisdom of the crowd' situation."
Hey, I resemble that remark!
I had kinda forgotten about it until then, but since it seems Billy Beane took note of it, I suppose it's time to dust off the old formula, and see what it says about the 2007 A's. I plugged in PECOTA's projections into the formula, and ran all the possible lineup combinations. The results are kinda weird, mostly because I think PECOTA's OBP projections are too high for Mark Ellis (.349) and too low for Mike Piazza (.324). So you may want to look at the results, and mentally flip-flop Piazza and Ellis, because the formula likes Mark Ellis batting cleanup. Cleanup!
Also, I used Bobby Kielty's projection, because he was the only name I could fill in for Dan Johnson that I was sure would be on the team. For what it's worth, Erubiel Durazo's projection (.333/.409) is nearly identical to Kielty's (.336/.408). Todd Walker has a higher projected OBP, but a lower SLG (.345/.402), but that projection was for Petco Park--the numbers might project higher in Oakland. Still, all three players project similarly, so it probably won't make much of a difference for this exercise.
The number beside the lineup is runs/162 games. The number will seem higher than actual team season run totals, probably because the optimal lineup never plays all 162 games. Lesser players get a lot of plate appearances besides the top nine players.
Top 10 Lineups
816.65 - Bradley Swisher Chavez Ellis Kielty Piazza Crosby Stewart Kendall
816.65 - Bradley Swisher Chavez Ellis Crosby Piazza Kielty Stewart Kendall
816.39 - Bradley Swisher Chavez Kielty Ellis Piazza Crosby Stewart Kendall
816.34 - Bradley Swisher Chavez Crosby Ellis Piazza Kielty Stewart Kendall
816.17 - Bradley Swisher Chavez Kielty Crosby Piazza Ellis Stewart Kendall
816.12 - Bradley Swisher Chavez Crosby Kielty Piazza Ellis Stewart Kendall
816.03 - Bradley Swisher Ellis Chavez Crosby Piazza Kielty Stewart Kendall
816.02 - Bradley Swisher Ellis Chavez Kielty Piazza Crosby Stewart Kendall
815.91 - Bradley Swisher Ellis Kielty Chavez Piazza Crosby Stewart Kendall
815.87 - Ellis Swisher Chavez Bradley Crosby Piazza Kielty Stewart Kendall
The projections are about 40 runs lower than last year's projections. It still likes Kendall batting ninth. Stewart is this year's Kotsay, which it likes eighth.
Last night on the A's broadcast of the Giants game (where a miked Rene Lachemann was a hoot), Bob Geren said the top six lineup spots would probably be Kendall, Stewart, Bradley, Piazza, Chavez, and Swisher. So let's look at that lineup:
798.54 - Kendall Stewart Bradley Piazza Chavez Swisher Crosby Ellis Kielty
That's pretty much right in the middle of the possible combinations.
And for fun:
Bottom 10 lineups
772.85 - Piazza Kendall Stewart Crosby Kielty Ellis Bradley Chavez Swisher
772.84 - Piazza Kendall Stewart Kielty Crosby Chavez Bradley Ellis Swisher
772.82 - Piazza Kendall Stewart Kielty Ellis Chavez Bradley Crosby Swisher
772.79 - Piazza Kendall Stewart Crosby Kielty Chavez Bradley Ellis Swisher
772.77 - Piazza Kendall Crosby Kielty Stewart Bradley Ellis Chavez Swisher
772.69 - Piazza Kendall Kielty Crosby Stewart Bradley Ellis Chavez Swisher
772.65 - Piazza Kendall Stewart Kielty Ellis Bradley Crosby Chavez Swisher
772.61 - Piazza Kendall Stewart Crosby Ellis Bradley Kielty Chavez Swisher
772.43 - Piazza Kendall Stewart Kielty Crosby Bradley Ellis Chavez Swisher
772.39 - Piazza Kendall Stewart Crosby Kielty Bradley Ellis Chavez Swisher
The slowest player in baseball history leading off? Yeah, that seems like a bad idea.
P.S. Go fill out TangoTiger's community projections, and show PECOTA a thing or two.
Hopefully this will lead to a substantial decrease in the casting of porosity league-wide.
1-Bradley (359/445)
2-Chavez (355/460)
3-Kielty/Durazo (Kielty at 339/409, but that should improve in a platoon. Durazo at 361/445, but only two systems even did a projection for him)
4-Swisher (362/484)
5-Piazza (340/460)
6-Stewart (347/407)
7-Ellis (342/411)
8-Crosby (328/413)
9-Kendall (363/351)
I also think Stewart and Bradley will do better than their projections, while Ellis and Kendall will do worse.
Walker came up early in the game with a runner on second and no outs, and got a pitch early in the count he could make contact with, and hit a grounder to second to advance the runner. Durazo comes up later with a similar situation, just stares at a fastball right down the middle for strike two, and then then whiffs on strike three, doing nothing to advance the cause. If Walker and Durazo are projected to put up similar numbers, I'll take the guy who does so making contact over the guy who whiffs and walks for a living.
Lineup optimization should at the very least breakdown between LHP and RHP.
I'm not crazy at all about the lineup optimizer program, if it's the one based on the regression work of Cy Morong.
Here's an analysis of the Phillies and Mariners of last year, which you can try to apply to the A's.
like with tangotiger's community projections, the a's believe they have inside information that pecota does not.
I agree that the projections don't match common sense much, so I take it with a big grain of salt.
Comment status: comments have been closed. Baseball Toaster is now out of business.