Baseball Toaster Catfish Stew
Log in | Register | Help
STOP CASTING POROSITY! An Oakland Athletics blog.
Hot from the Toaster
Search
Google Search
Web
Toaster
Catfish Stew
Archives

2008
08  07 
06  05  04  03  02  01 

2007
12  11  10  09  08  07 
06  05  04  03  02  01 

2006
12  11  10  09  08  07 
06  05  04  03  02  01 

2005
12  11  10  09  08  07 
06  05  04  03  01 

2004
12  09  08  01 

2003
12  11  10  09  08 
A's Web Sites
MLB Heavyweight Champion

If MLB champs were decided like boxing: beat the champ, and you're the champ.

The 2008 season started with the Red Sox as champs. They were beaten by the A's, who were beaten back by Boston, who were then swept by Toronto, who lost to Oakland, who lost to Cleveland, and so on, until we reached our current champion.

The Heavyweight of the Year is the team that wins the most title bouts at the end of the season.

Current Champion (as of 8/12):
Milwaukee Brewers

2008 Title Bout Records:

Mets2317
Athletics1313
Red Sox117
Cubs91
Padres86
Rockies714
Angels64
Indians611
Brewers50
Cardinals55
Reds55
Dodgers57
Marlins43
Rangers46
Blue Jays33
Nationals35
Mariners21
Yankees23
Phillies25
Tigers12
Giants03
Orioles03

2007 Heavyweight of the Year:
Seattle Mariners

2006 Heavyweight of the Year:
Oakland Athletics

2005 Heavyweight of the Year:
Oakland Athletics

more info...

Email Us

Ken: catfish AT zombia d.o.t. com
Ryan: rarmbrust AT gmail d.o.t. com
Philip: kingchimp AT alamedanet d.o.t net

Minor Leagues
Syndication

rss2.0

Add to My Yahoo!
An Offensive Offense, a Dozen Times Over
2007-07-18 13:18
by Ryan Armbrust

Though the A's managed to score more than three runs for the first time in a dozen games last night, they still lost. Oakland now carries a 44-50 record, six games below .500, 12.0 games back of the Angels and 11.0 games out of the wild card. It might be time to face the reality that this just might not be a playoff-caliber team. For the first time in a decade, the A's will be sellers at the trading deadline -- and they've already begun by unloading Jason Kendall on the unsuspecting Cubs.

Now, I'm as optimistic as the next guy when it comes to my team, but after taking a long, hard look at where Oakland stands, it's hard to imagine a scenario in which they can make up a dozen games. The offense is putrid (second to last in the league in runs scored), and shows no signs of the impending sea change needed to challenge in the AL West. Though the aformentioned streak of scoring three runs or less had been halted, a similar streak is still going strong. For the last 12 games, Oakland has scored four runs or less while garnering eight hits or fewer. That's one of the longest streaks of its kind since 1957, as far back as retrosheet data goes. Here are the other teams to score 4 or less while getting eight hits or fewer:

 

A pretty pathetic lot. The real story about those dozen teams is that none made the playoffs, and almost every one of them finished the season below the .500 mark.

 

1972 was a bad year for offense, apparently, with five teams going on epic slumps that season. Even when subjected to the pythagorean method of qualifying their win-loss records, there's not much improvement. The composite winning percentage improves from .463 to .466 -- an insignificant amount.

 

If the A's pitching holds up and the offense wakes up out of its funk, there is still hope that Oakland could finish above the .500 mark, but a spot in the playoffs just may not be in the A's future for this season. I hope I'm wrong, and we see Oakland go on a monumental tear to make a run at the post-season, but it's hard to ignore the flood of evidence that points to the contrary. This just isn't a very good team right now.

Comments
2007-07-19 10:43:38
1.   drodd1039
if anyone is interested, I found this page that has up to date Athletics news feeds

http://www.dcdeal.com/athletics/

2007-07-19 15:22:40
2.   Vishal
i totally agree. something radical needs to be done. the offense stinks and the pitching isn't even as good as we thought. i'm sure beane will be busy at the deadline. would you say that beane has made bad calls/decisions over the past few years, or has he simply gotten unlucky?

also, re: "four runs or less while garnering eight hits or fewer"... why did you use less in one instance and fewer in the other? i could be wrong here, but isn't it "fewer" when it's something discrete, and "less" when it's something unquantifiable? sorry, i'm a nerd, i know.

2007-07-19 16:07:17
3.   Ryan Armbrust
2 Well, I used "less" and "fewer" because I felt like I was being repetitive by saying "fewer" twice... although you're absolutely right, it should be "fewer" in both cases.
Advertisement
Post a comment   (Help)

To comment, please log in.

Not a member? Register!