Baseball Toaster Catfish Stew
Help
STOP CASTING POROSITY! An Oakland Athletics blog.
Frozen Toast
Search
Google Search
Web
Toaster
Catfish Stew
Archives

2009
02  01 

2008
12  11  10  09  08  07 
06  05  04  03  02  01 

2007
12  11  10  09  08  07 
06  05  04  03  02  01 

2006
12  11  10  09  08  07 
06  05  04  03  02  01 

2005
12  11  10  09  08  07 
06  05  04  03  01 

2004
12  09  08  01 

2003
12  11  10  09  08 
Email Us

Ken: catfish AT zombia d.o.t. com
Ryan: rarmbrust AT gmail d.o.t. com
Philip: kingchimp AT alamedanet d.o.t net

Ken's Greatest Hits
28 Aug 2003
12 Jan 2004
31 May 2005
11 May 2005
29 Jun 2005
8 Jun 2005
19 Jul 2005
11 Aug 2005
7 Sep 2005
20 Sep 2005
22 Sep 2005
26 Sep 2005
28 Sep 2005
29 Sep 2005
18 Oct 2005
9 Nov 2005
15 Nov 2005
20 Nov 2005

13 Dec 2005
19 Jan 2006
28 Jan 2006
21 Feb 2006
10 Apr 2006
16 Apr 2006
22 Apr 2006
7 May 2006
25 May 2006
31 May 2006
18 Jun 2006
22 Jun 2006
6 Jul 2006
17 Jul 2006
13 Aug 2006
15 Aug 2006
16 Aug 2006
20 Aug 2006
11 Oct 2006
31 Oct 2006
29 Dec 2006
4 Jan 2006
12 Jan 2006
27 Jan 2007
17 Feb 2007
30 Apr 2007
27 Aug 2007
5 Sep 2007
19 Oct 2007
23 Nov 2007
5 Jan 2008
16 Jan 2008
4 Feb 2008
7 May 2008
20 Jun 2008
4 Feb 2008
Huzzah for Nicholas Swisher, Base-ball Enthusiast
2006-08-06 21:06
by Philip Michaels

Supporters of the Oakland Athletics Base-Ball Club are invited to attend a public speech by Nicholas Swisher, a Base-Ball player of extra-ordinary talent, who will be appearing at a tavern near the Oakland ball grounds following an upcoming contest against the Texas nine. Mr. Swisher will be speaking about his exploits upon the Base-Ball diamond in addition to opining about the recent rule change in which a foul bunt is now considered by the umpire to be a strike. In addition, Mr. Swisher will give a rousing endorsement of President McKinley and his policies as well as a stirring denunciation of the free-silver movement.

Veterans of the recent conflict against the Spaniard will be admitted to the tavern free.

Persons of Irish extraction, anarchists, and other men of low character are discouraged from appearing at the emporium.

Comments
2006-08-06 21:32:40
1.   Bob Timmermann
My grandmother's second husband fought against the Spaniards! But I'm also part Irish.

But I believe in free silver.

2006-08-06 21:34:40
2.   Daniel Zappala
Fantastic! Welcome aboard!
2006-08-06 21:37:04
3.   das411
Do I count as an anarchist if I was rooting for the Padres to finish below .500 last year?
2006-08-06 21:37:07
4.   Philip Michaels
1 Then you are welcome to attend Mr. Swisher's talk.

But you must stand in the hallway.

2006-08-06 21:48:50
5.   Jon Weisman
No matter how hard I've tried, I have never been able to wrap my brain around the gold vs. silver debate.

It's as if you were trying to explain to me why $20 is better than a peanut.

2006-08-06 22:21:09
6.   Ken Arneson
Huzzah, indeed! Free silver is an oxymoron, and so is every one of its supporters!
2006-08-06 22:27:36
7.   Bob Timmermann
5

Hey, you went to Stanford, you should know this stuff.

Basically, people in the West wanted silver since it was mined out there at the time. And if the government bought lots of it and made it into currency, then you could inflate prices and pay off all your debts very quickly.

People on the East Coast, who owned banks and tended to be owed debts, did not like this. Not one bit.

It's sort of like being told that you could pay off your $20 debt to me not with a Federal Reserve Note, but with some predetermined amount of peanuts. I'd rather have the Federal Reserve Note.

2006-08-06 22:33:01
8.   Linkmeister
Even though the Federal Reserve Note replaced Silver Certificates?

Cue up William Jennings Bryan (pre-Scopes trial).

2006-08-06 22:38:08
9.   Bob Timmermann
You shall not crucify Nick Swisher upon this cross of green and gold!
2006-08-06 22:48:42
10.   Ken Arneson
I should also point out, for that sake of clarity, that although I support Mr. Swisher and his unflattering views on bimetallism, I shall not be attending the emporium, as I am currently beholden by oath to avoid consumption of any Swisher-brand ingestibles. My Swisher fast shall remain in effect until such time that certain pre-defined conditions of Base-ball quality have been achieved and verified.
2006-08-06 22:53:03
11.   Linkmeister
"currently beholden by oath"

Which instantly reminds me of the scene in LOTR where Aragorn speaks to the Dead after passing along their Paths:

"Oathbreakers, why have you come?"

2006-08-06 23:11:39
12.   Ken Arneson
Spoilermakers, why have you come? Some of us have yet to see LOTR! Now the suspense is ruined. Ruined!
2006-08-06 23:59:51
13.   Bob Timmermann
You mean those movies are finally over?
2006-08-07 01:34:57
14.   Ken Arneson
What are these "movies" of which you speak? Is it a new sort of theater?

I wonder, will the tavern provide musical entertainment, as well? If so, I may have to consider making an exception to my vows. I simply can't get enough of that Bile Bean March!

static.baseballtoaster.com/blogs/catfishstew/audio/bilebeanmarch.mid

2006-08-07 10:20:22
15.   Bob Timmermann
But wait! Foul bunts were first called strikes in 1894! Four years before the war against the Spaniard. And why would a fine player like young Mr. Swisher be concerned with baby hits. Those plays are for small men like Mr. Keeler or Mr. McGraw.
2006-08-07 10:21:11
16.   DXMachina
Speaking of theatre, it's only a brief step from the mention of William McKinley to Sondheim's "Ballad of Czolgosz."

Swisher, first baseman,
Born in the state south of Michigan,
Picked up his bat and away he ran
To the Rangers' ballpark, Ameriquest Field in Arlington, in Arlington.

Saw the Athletics needed a run,
Said, "Time's a-wasting, it's two and one.
Some pitchers have good stuff and some have none, so time to shine.
In the A.L. West you can work your way to the head of the line."

2006-08-07 11:06:52
17.   Robert Daeley
Mr. Michaels and I may have to throw fists in a right donnybrook if he does not retract his thickheaded opinions of the Irish.
2006-08-07 12:26:28
18.   Linkmeister
12 I'm not sure that phrase is actually in the movie version. I was quoting from the text.

Spoilermaker, indeed.

2006-08-07 15:40:43
19.   Bob Timmermann
It was a book?
2006-08-07 16:43:42
20.   Philip Michaels
15 In flipping through Koppet's Concise History of Baseball, I couldn't find any rule changes from the 1898/1899 time frame that leant themselves to hilarity, unless you want to consider alterations to the pitching rubber. So yeah, I went with th 1894 rule change.

If you'd like, just pretend that it took awhile for the steamship bearing the news of the rule change to arrive in Oakland, seeing as how it had to sail around Cape Horn.

2006-08-07 21:41:24
21.   Bob Timmermann
This site is handy for these questions:
http://www.baseballlibrary.com/baseballlibrary/excerpts/rules_chronology.stm

Comment status: comments have been closed. Baseball Toaster is now out of business.