Baseball Toaster Catfish Stew
STOP CASTING POROSITY! An Oakland Athletics blog.
Frozen Toast
Google Search
Catfish Stew

02  01 

12  11  10  09  08  07 
06  05  04  03  02  01 

12  11  10  09  08  07 
06  05  04  03  02  01 

12  11  10  09  08  07 
06  05  04  03  02  01 

12  11  10  09  08  07 
06  05  04  03  01 

12  09  08  01 

12  11  10  09  08 
Email Us

Ken: catfish AT zombia d.o.t. com
Ryan: rarmbrust AT gmail d.o.t. com
Philip: kingchimp AT alamedanet d.o.t net

Ken's Greatest Hits
28 Aug 2003
12 Jan 2004
31 May 2005
11 May 2005
29 Jun 2005
8 Jun 2005
19 Jul 2005
11 Aug 2005
7 Sep 2005
20 Sep 2005
22 Sep 2005
26 Sep 2005
28 Sep 2005
29 Sep 2005
18 Oct 2005
9 Nov 2005
15 Nov 2005
20 Nov 2005

13 Dec 2005
19 Jan 2006
28 Jan 2006
21 Feb 2006
10 Apr 2006
16 Apr 2006
22 Apr 2006
7 May 2006
25 May 2006
31 May 2006
18 Jun 2006
22 Jun 2006
6 Jul 2006
17 Jul 2006
13 Aug 2006
15 Aug 2006
16 Aug 2006
20 Aug 2006
11 Oct 2006
31 Oct 2006
29 Dec 2006
4 Jan 2006
12 Jan 2006
27 Jan 2007
17 Feb 2007
30 Apr 2007
27 Aug 2007
5 Sep 2007
19 Oct 2007
23 Nov 2007
5 Jan 2008
16 Jan 2008
4 Feb 2008
7 May 2008
20 Jun 2008
4 Feb 2008
Defending Murray Chass
2007-03-04 01:32
by Ken Arneson

If you spend any time working as any sort of designer or engineer, you quickly discover that human beings are absolutely horrible at explaining what they want. A client will come to you and insist on some crazy feature ("We need a big photograph in the middle of this web page") which to an expert is just obviously a bad idea for five reasons you can think of right away, and another couple dozen reasons lurking beyond, and so you have to delicately steer the conversation to dig down beneath the surface of this seemingly stupid request to find the real reason they suddenly want this change. You ask dozens of questions and pick apart what they say until you discover that the problem has nothing to do with a lack of photographs at all, they just want the page to have more three-dimensional depth. So you simply add a drop shadow to the border, and all is well.

The human mind is like that. We're very good at sensing when something isn't quite right, but we're really awful at consciously understanding what the problem is and how to solve it. Still, that doesn't stop us from guessing. Weirdest of all, we convince ourselves that our guess isn't a guess: this really IS the problem, and we really DO need this solution.

So when Murray Chass goes rambling that these newfangled statistics are ruining the game, I thought, I recognize this pattern. It's an obviously preposterous statement. But this isn't coming from some ignorant blowhard message board troll, it's coming from a Hall-of-Fame writer. There probably is a real problem here, but the problem is not VORP, and the solution isn't to ban it.

Here's the key statement:

But their attempt to introduce these new-age statistics into the game threatens to undermine most fans' enjoyment of baseball and the human factor therein.

The idea that statistics can undermine the enjoyment of baseball is obviously preposterous. It's easy to provide plenty of counterexamples to prove that statement false. The real problem, if I can read between the lines a bit, is this: Nobody has any friggin' idea why fans enjoy baseball.

When we ask the question, "Why do teams win?", we can respond with precise measurements like OPS and WARP and VORP. But when we ask the (IMO) more important question, "Why do we watch?", we fumble around for answers like, well, design clients.

Baseball is a sort of Age of Enlightment when it comes to understanding why teams win. The Bill James, Nate Silver, and Tom Tango characters of this era are transforming our understanding of how teams win, just as Galileo, Copernicus, and Newton transformed our understanding of how the universe works.

But when we try to understand why we're so fascinated by this sport, we're still in the Dark Ages. Sure, we'll make guesses, but our guesses are pretty much the equivalent of describing the sun as a burning chariot traveling across the sky. We talk not in measurements, but in vague terms like "the human factor." Basically, when it comes to why people watch baseball, we're primitive barbarians who still believe in magic.

Never get between a barbarian and his magic. I'd explain why, but it's a long, tall tale.

2007-03-04 06:21:47
1.   Adam B
This is the same guy who made up a story on the Dodgers considering filing tampering charges against the Red Sox over J.D. Drew because Chass let his homerism out when he wrote an article about the issue. Seth Mnookin (author of Feeding The Monster) debunked those claims.
2007-03-04 08:55:41
2.   Xeifrank
at best case, I'd say it's a sense of "Who Moved My Cheese" on Murray's behalf. You know the whole deal about people getting comfy and not adjusting well to change. Just out of curiousity how old is Murray and what is his baseball background? ie-journalist in Boston paper for 20 years
vr, Xei
2007-03-04 09:08:23
3.   Bob Timmermann
Murray Chass's Spink Award bio:

2007-03-04 09:51:39
4.   Elliot
My first thought was basically was Xeifrank just said. Matt Cerrone of Metsblog let out some interesting information when he noted in passing this week that Murray Chass once emailed Matt, basically scolding him, asking "What gives you the right to write about baseball?" In various ways, Chass' reaction isn't surprising at all. Imagine being classically trained at carpentry or shoemaking or web design, and then having new technology render your training useless as just about anyone can make up the gap fairly easily. So I don't begrudge Chass for feeling like he does, only for his self-reverence in the first place and lack of class and grace.
2007-03-04 10:57:57
5.   yankz
I've been a baseball fan for a very long time, and for the past few years, I've been trying to figure out why I'm so addicted. One day it just hit me, and it was amazing, and I wrote a really long essay about it. It has a lot to do with the "magic" you describe. I'm sure there's more to the reason, and I'm also sure it's different for every person.
2007-03-04 14:17:10
6.   Andrew Shimmin
If long and tall, the tale was also excellent. I'm sorry I missed it the first time around.
2007-03-08 13:09:35
7.   Tangotiger
The reason we watch baseball, in graph form:

Comment status: comments have been closed. Baseball Toaster is now out of business.